Julia Ormond ‘Nearly Disappeared’ From Hollywood. Now We Know Why.

Over the years, actress Julia Ormond recently told Variety, journalists have often asked her, “What happened to you?” Now, we appear to have gotten our answer. In a lawsuit filed Wednesday in New York Supreme Court, Ormond alleges that Harvey Weinstein sexually assaulted her—and that afterward, she “nearly disappeared from the public eye” thanks to his retaliation.

In addition to Weinstein, Ormond is suing Miramax, the Walt Disney Company, and Creative Artists Agency (CAA)—all of which she called “enablers” in an interview with the magazine. While Ormond’s star was on the rise in the mid-1990s, her lawsuit claims that the damage to her career “because of Weinstein’s assault and the aftermath was catastrophic both personally and professionally.” Looking back on profiles of the actress from that era, the tension she’d begun to feel within the industry seems readily apparent.

Representatives for CAA, Miramax, and Disney did not immediately respond to Daily Beast reporter Pilar Melendez’s request for comment on the lawsuit. Imran H. Ansari, a lawyer for Weinstein, told Melendez in a statement that he “categorically denies the allegations made against him by Julia Ormond and he is prepared to vehemently defend himself. This is yet another example of a complaint filed against Mr. Weinstein after the passing of decades, and he is confident that the evidence will not support Ms. Ormond’s claims.”

‘Sabrina’ Star Julia Ormond Sues Harvey Weinstein for Sexual Assault

After getting her start as a classically trained English theater actress, Ormond’s first screen role came in 1989 with the British TV series Traffik. A few years later, she shot to fame with 1994’s Legends of the Fall and 1995’s First Knight and Sabrina—and not long after that her career suddenly seemed to shrink into what the AV Club once described as “more colorful supporting roles.”

Profiles of Ormond from 1995 capture a thoughtful actress struggling to retain control over her brand and her career—an impulse that even she admitted at the time had earned her a dreaded, often sexist industry label, “difficult.”

In April of that year, the New York Times published a lengthy deep dive on Ormond’s rapid rise to fame that scrutinized the “Hollywood machinery now determined to make her a star.” The article also probed the young actress’ relationship with that behemoth; given what all it entails, reporter David Blum wondered, did she even want this kind of stardom at all?

Like other profiles from the time, the piece offers a fascinating window into the way media spoke about rising female stars in the 1990s.

“Julia’s never really had to struggle that much,” Ormond’s British agent, Patricia Marmont, told the Times. “She’s beautiful and she’s talented, and that always works.”

Regarding Ormond supposedly being “difficult,” another source described only as a “high-placed Hollywood wag” said, “Let’s just say the word is out.” Meanwhile, Jerry Zucker—who directed Ormond in First Knight—refuted that idea. “If you respect Julia, and her right to say what she wants, she'll treat you great in return,” he said. Ormond herself told the Times that she first began to notice her growing reputation after creative differences arose on the set of the TNT miniseries Young Catherine.

“Every interview that I went up for the next year, they asked me what I was like to work with,” Ormond told the Times. “It’s not necessarily about being bosom buddies. It doesn’t have to be easy. It can be really aggravating and frustrating and yet deeply satisfying.”

One person who gave Ormond a glowing review? Weinstein himself, who told the Times that the rising Sabrina star had “the best story sense of any young actress in America today.” The Times added that Ormond was “one of a brain trust of actors, directors and producers” the mogul and now-convicted rapist would trust to look over new material.

And yet, “someone very close to Ormond” who remained anonymous also ominously told the paper, “Ten years from now, you—or some reporter—will be asking me, ‘Whatever happened to Julia Ormond?’... You know how it is. The process never ends.”

Months later, The Washington Post published a profile from Paula Span that named the dynamic Ormond seemed to be facing more directly. “And of course,” Span wrote, “there’s the Gender Thing.”

According to Span’s profile, Ormond was “about to sign a deal with Miramax” at the time that would have allowed her to “develop, produce or direct movies of her own.” (Weinstein was still in charge of the company at the time.)

Span observed that during roundtable interviews promoting 1995’s Sabrina, in which Ormond played the title character, director Sydney Pollack and Harrison Ford both referred to the actresses who’d been considered to play the role as “girls.” Earlier that year, Ormond had reportedly turned down the chance to be featured on the cover of Vanity Fair alongside actresses including Jennifer Jason Leigh, Nicole Kidman, and Uma Thurman—all of whom she respected. As Span noted, “nearly all of them stripped to their skivvies” for the cover image.

“This is the new generation of women in film,” Ormond told Span. “This is what they do: They pose on magazine covers in their underwear.”

Ormond has spoken before about her sudden shunning from Tinseltown, but according to Variety—which first reported the lawsuit—she had not discussed her allegations against Weinstein with anyone beyond her agents until now. Back in 2007, Ormond told The Daily Mail that the backlash she faced within the industry was “really predictable.”

“I could see it coming as a reaction to the hype,” she said at the time. “I was at the center of the hype, but I didn’t agree with it, either. I think it probably prevented me from really enjoying that period, though.”

At the same time, the actress added that her life did not completely shut down. “I did a documentary about Bosnian women in Serbian detention camps, I did a radio play, I worked with Harold Pinter… and I threw a ton of time into personal stuff and fell in love and had a baby.”

Although Ormond was working hard to open up her image when she spoke with the Post—as the actress put it at the time, she’d come across “as terribly serious” in previous profiles—she also couldn’t help but share an ambition for women in Hollywood, as it related to the Miramax deal she was set to sign.

“It’s up to women to develop their own stuff,” she said, “take the responsibilities and the risks. ...Take the female away from the appendix role—the wife, the girlfriend, the one who does the sex scene.”

“I can no longer sit back and say, ‘Oh, there are so few good parts for women,’” Ormond continued, “when I’ve been given this opportunity.”

Juror Who Convicted Weinstein Predicts His Final Downfall

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Get the Daily Beast's biggest scoops and scandals delivered right to your inbox. Sign up now.

Stay informed and gain unlimited access to the Daily Beast's unmatched reporting. Subscribe now.