Guns N' Roses Files a Lawsuit Against Texas Gun Store for Allegedly Using Band's Name in Its Moniker

Guilherme Nunes Cunha Neto

Guns N' Roses has filed a lawsuit against a Texas gun store for using the band's name in the shop's moniker.

The group — which is composed of members Axl Rose, Slash, Duff McKagan, Dizzy Reed, Richard Fortus, Frank Ferrer and Melissa Reese — is asking the store, called Texas Guns and Roses, to change its name and pay damages, according to legal documents obtained by PEOPLE.

The complaint alleges that the store's name insinuates that it is linked to the "Paradise City" band, and states that it has utilized the "defendant's marks for the purpose of confusing consumers into believing that it was connected or associated with, or licensed by, GNR."

Guns N' Roses also claims that the store — which is operated by Jersey Village Florist — sells roses along with firearms, in an effort to justify the "wholesale appropriation" of the Guns N' Roses trademark.

A representative for both Guns N' Roses and Texas Guns and Roses did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

Guilherme Nunes Cunha Neto

RELATED: Guns N' Roses' Axl Rose Says He'll Stop 'Tossing the Mic' into Crowd After Reportedly Injuring Fan

The Texas Guns and Roses store filed for a trademark in 2014 and later registered in 2016, according to its U.S. Patent and Trade Office registration. Guns N' Roses learned of the store using its likeness in 2019, the lawsuit states, and sent a cease and desist letter in 2020.

The complaint also alleges that the store continued to "intentionally trade on GNR's goodwill, prestige and fame without GNR's approval, license or consent," despite the cease and desist letter.

"This is particularly damaging to GNR given the nature of defendant's business. GNR, quite reasonably, does not want to be associated with defendant, a firearms and weapons retailer," the complaint continues.

"Furthermore, the defendant espouses political views related to the regulation and control of firearms and weapons on the website that may be polarizing to many U.S. consumers," it adds.

Want to get the biggest stories from PEOPLE every weekday? Subscribe to our new podcast, PEOPLE Every Day, to get the essential celebrity, entertainment and human interest news stories Monday through Friday.

David L. Clark, a defense attorney representing Texas Guns and Roses, told City News Service, per NBC Los Angeles: "There's never been any confusion and they have no evidence of confusion. This is an attempt to run up costs and burn us out."

"Our client sells metal safes for guns and flowers, and have a one-stop website and absolutely no one is confused. Nobody thinks we're the band or there is some affiliation," he added. "We will be fighting back."