• Home
  • Mail
  • Tumblr
  • News
  • Sports
  • Finance
  • Entertainment
  • Lifestyle
  • Answers
  • Groups
  • Mobile
  • More
Yahoo
    • Skip to Navigation
    • Skip to Main Content
    • Skip to Related Content
    • Mail
    Entertainment Home
    Follow Us
    • Diversity in Hollywood
    • Oscars
    • TV
    • Movies
    • Celebrity
    • Music
    • Videos
    • Movie Showtimes

    Ben Affleck's Batman out! Dueling Jokers in! Everything we know about DC's movie future

    Nick Schager
    Writer
    Yahoo MoviesJune 14, 2018
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share
    Is this the last we’ll see of Ben Affleck as Batman? (Photo: Warner Bros.)

    While Marvel continues to thrive at the multiplex — most recently with the $1.34 billion-grossing Black Panther and $2 billion-earning Avengers: Infinity War — things have been far less rosy for Warner Bros. and DC Comics’ own movie universe. Hoping to counter the negative feedback received for 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, the franchise’s most recent entry, last November’s Justice League, attempted to take a more lighthearted approach to its spandex-clad do-gooders. Alas, with a disappointing $658 million global haul, the team-up proved to be DC’s least lucrative endeavor to date. And that, in turn, has led to a massive shakeup that puts DC’s cinematic future in flux.

    Earlier this week, the Hollywood Reporter published an ominous piece about the turmoil currently taking place at DC, which includes saying goodbye to longtime president Diane Nelson and creative head honcho Geoff Johns. All this follows last year’s departure of Zack Snyder, who had been the architect of the so-called DC Extended Universe, whose gritty superhero vision didn’t sit well with critics. More importantly to fans, THR’s report also announced that Matt Reeves had handed in a first draft of his upcoming standalone Batman movie, and it apparently focuses on a younger caped crusader. This, in turn, means that after years of back-and-forth rumors, Ben Affleck is on the verge of being replaced in the role. Batfleck, we hardly knew you.

    As if that weren’t enough of a seismic shakeup, the studio is also planning to produce two separate movies focused on the Joker — one starring Jared Leto’s incarnation of the Clown Prince of Crime (who was first introduced in 2016’s Suicide Squad), and the other headlined by Joaquin Phoenix, directed by Todd Phillips, and executive-produced by Martin Scorsese. Presumably, Leto’s film will be connected to the greater (and ongoing) DC movie universe that also features Henry Cavill’s Man of Steel and Gal Gadot’s Amazonian warrior. Phoenix’s vehicle, on the other hand, will remain outside that framework à la Reeves’s aforementioned young-Batman movies, and thus help DC establish a spinoff brand (THR says it may be called “DC Dark” or “DC Black”) for its most famous figures.

    Such tumultuousness is hardly a reassuring sign that the DC powers that be have figured out how to handle their cinematic series going forward. Still, projects remain on the horizon — both in reality and in theory. A rundown of what’s ahead:

    Aquaman

    James Wan’s take on Jason Momoa’s king of the deep (co-starring Amber Heard, Willem Dafoe, Patrick Wilson, and Nicole Kidman) is set to debut in theaters on Dec. 21. Though it’s been largely kept under wraps (save for a few standard publicity stills), the DC team is beginning to tout its “big, bright, colorful action” — a clear sign that it’s intent on differentiating it from the more aesthetically and tonally dour Zack Snyder entries in the franchise.

    Shazam!

    Starring Zachary Levi as the superheroic version of young boy Billy Batson (played by Asher Angel), and directed by Lights Out’s David F. Sandberg, DC’s origin story for its mythic lightning-bolt-decorated character will fly into theaters on April 5, 2019. Not much is known about the plot right now, although Levi told us earlier this year that he considers the project to be akin to the Tom Hanks classic Big.

    Wonder Woman 1984

    On Wednesday, we finally learned the title of Patty Jenkins’s eagerly anticipated sequel to last year’s $822 million-grossing blockbuster, which has just started production and will premiere on Nov. 1, 2019. Given the original’s enthusiastic reception, and the return of basically every creative principal for this ’80s-set follow-up — including, mysteriously, Chris Pine as the killed-in-action Steve Trevor — hopes are exceedingly high.

    From there, the DC slate gets far murkier.

    Flashpoint

    Next April, cameras may finally start rolling on a standalone Flash movie starring Ezra Miller, which will take a more Back to the Future-style approach to its action than the darker version initially conceived by Snyder. In the classic comics storyline, Flashpoint served to reboot the entire DC Universe. Could the film have a similar role in the cinematic universe?

    Birds of Prey

    The Harley Quinn-led girl-gang film starring Margot Robbie, Birds of Prey (which teams her with fellow female baddies Catwoman and Poison Ivy), recently hired Cathy Yan to direct, but no further details have yet materialized.

    Batgirl

    After original director Joss Whedon walked away from the film, Batgirl is still in development, and has hired Christina Hodson — who wrote the aforementioned Birds of Prey movie, as well as this December’s Bumblebee — to pen a new script.

    Green Lantern Corps

    Having given up his executive post at DC, Johns is now hard at work writing a Green Lantern Corps film that, we can safely assume, will have no connection to 2011’s Ryan Reynolds-led bomb, which Reynolds pokes merciless fun at in Deadpool 2.

    Justice League Dark

    Director Doug Liman bailed on the project last year due to a scheduling snafu, and so far no new helmer has been named for the film originally conceived by Guillermo del Toro. Justice League Dark involves a completely different roster of the team that handles supernatural threats. The lineup was going to feature less-known characters like John Constantine, Swamp Thing, Deadman, Zatanna, and Etrigan the Demon.

    Suicide Squad 2/Justice League 2

    Then, of course, there are the expected sequels to Suicide Squad and Justice League. The former will be shepherded to the screen by Gavin O’Connor (The Accountant), and may introduce the world to Shazam nemesis Black Adam, who’ll be played by Dwayne “the Rock” Johnson. The latter, as of now, seems off the radar — and probably will remain so for the foreseeable future, as DC tries to figure out what to do with Affleck and Batman.

    One thing’s for sure — the path ahead remains rocky, and things may still change for any of these projects at a moment’s notice. But DC isn’t giving up yet on its blockbuster dreams, so fans can be sure more superhero offerings are on the way.

    Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

    • Wonder Woman’s greatest hero feat? Bringing Chris Pine back from the dead for very ’80s sequel
    • ‘Grease’ was almost an animated movie that could have looked like this
    • ‘Incredibles 2’ stars think their sequel is helping to lead the female superhero movement
    Reblog
    Share
    Tweet
    Share

    What to Read Next

    • KTLA Anchor Chris Burrous’ Cause of Death Released

      Variety
    • Comedian Brody Stevens Dies at 48

      Variety
    • Boyfriend Elbows Girlfriend in the Head to Catch Hockey Puck — Then Gives It to Another Woman!

      People
    • Ariana Grande's Fans Call Her Out for Sleeping with Her Makeup On — and Her Clapback Is Epic

      People
    • Gwyneth Paltrow Says She's The Real Victim In Ski Slope Hit-Run

      HuffPost
    • Kim and Kourtney Kardashian Remember Their Late Father Robert on His Birthday

      Entertainment Tonight
    • Jordyn Woods Lashes Out After Blow-Up with Kardashians: ‘It’s Been Real’

      TheBlast
    • Robert Kraft Isn't 'Biggest Name Involved' in Human Trafficking Scandal: Reports

      People
    • Charles Barkley Clowns on Jussie Smollett: ‘He Shoulda Just Went Out in Liam Neeson’s Neighborhood!’

      TheBlast
    • ‘The Masked Singer’: Rumer Willis Reveals Why She Chose the 'Strong and Confident' Lion Costume! (Exclusive)

      Entertainment Tonight
    • R. Kelly’s Girlfriend, Joycelyn Savage, Shows Up to Support Singer During Bail Hearing

      TheBlast
    • Lamar Odom 'Hates' That Khloé Kardashian Has Been 'Hurt Again' and 'Wants to Reach Out': Source

      People
    • Khloé Kardashian Unfollows Jordyn Woods on Instagram... But Still Follows Tristan Thompson

      People
    • Spike Lee on his long road from 'Do the Right Thing' to 'BlacKkKlansman'

      Yahoo Movies
    • Will Kylie Jenner and Jordyn Woods Remain Friends After Tristan Thompson Cheating Scandal?

      People
    • Karl Lagerfeld Left Instructions to His Store Employees About How He Wanted to Be Remembered

      People

    Girl banned from wearing MAGA hat claims school is violating her First Amendment rights

    Pipper: the Supreme Court laid out in four landmark decisions. Schools may restrict students’ speech if it: is likely to disrupt school is lewd promotes illegal drug use, or is part of the curriculum or communications sponsored by the school. The younger the students, the more leeway schools have to control their speech. Several lower courts have recognized another principle: The younger the students, the more leeway schools have to control their speech. (By the same token, colleges and universities have less latitude when they try to restrict older students’ speech.) Disruptive Speech The Supreme Court found that a school violated students’ First Amendment rights by suspending them for wearing black armbands as an antiwar protest (an example of what’s known as “symbolic speech”). As the court explained, school officials may not squelch the expression of unpopular opinions just to avoid “discomfort and unpleasantness.” Instead, they need to show that the banned speech would create a “substantial disruption” at school or would violate other students’ rights. (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969).) Students, school administrators, and lower courts often disagree about what qualifies as a substantial disruption. The issue is even more complicated now, when so many controversies over disruptive speech are related to social media posts and other online speech. Courts consider several factors when deciding whether disruption from a student’s speech is too disruptive, including: Did it interfere with classwork or other school activities? Did it cause disorder on campus? Were other students so upset that they couldn’t concentrate or visited school counselors in droves? Did administrators and/or teachers have to take considerable time away from their regular duties in order to deal with the fallout? School officials don’t have to prove that a student’s speech already interfered with school before they take action. But in order to justify punishing the student, administrators do need to show that it was reasonable for them to predict that would happen. The fear of disruption has to be specific and significant. Vague or general worries aren’t enough. Along with the content of the speech, context and tone matter. Vulgar Speech In another case where a high school student gave a speech at school that was filled with explicit sexual metaphors, the Supreme Court found that the First Amendment didn’t prevent schools from disciplining children for offensively lewd and indecent speech. As the court explained, society’s interest in teaching “the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior” outweighed the student’s right to express his views in a way that was highly offensive to many of his classmates. (Bethel School Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).) Dangerous Speech After another high school student was suspended for refusing to take down a banner reading “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS” at a school event, he sued. The Supreme Court found that the principal hadn’t violated the boy’s free speech rights, because it was part of the school’s mission to protect students from messages that could be seen as promoting or celebrating illegal drug use (Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007)). Based on the reasoning in Morse, courts have given schools a fair amount of leeway in deciding whether students’ speech poses a danger to their classmates or teachers. School-Sponsored Speech and Student Journalism Teachers and other school authorities are allowed to censor or change what students write or say in school-sponsored publications (like an official school newspaper or yearbook), school plays, or other activities that involve the expression of ideas and are essentially part of the curriculum. The school must have a legitimate educational reason for the censorship. However, this broad editorial control doesn't apply if school authorities have, "by policy or by practice," allowed a school paper or online publication to become what courts call a public forum—meaning that it's an open platform for students to express themselves freely and make key decisions about content without prior approval from teachers or administrators. (Hazelwood School Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).) Most courts agree that this rule applies only to K-12 schools. Schools generally have less control over "underground" student journalism, whether online or in print. Also, a few states have laws that give student journalists greater free-speech protections than they have under the federal Hazelwood standard.

    Join the Conversation
    1 / 5

    5.3k

    • Fake news: Kim and Trump lookalikes draw crowds in Hanoi

      Reuters
    • Tom Brady, Gisele Bundchen pack on the PDA at rare red carpet event: Photos

      AOL.com
    • Robert Kraft Is a 'Different Person' After Wife's Death, Source Says Amid Prostitution Scandal

      People
    • Anna Wintour, Princess Caroline of Monaco and More Mourn at Karl Lagerfeld's Cremation

      People
    • Clark Gable’s Grandson, Who Hosted ‘Cheaters,’ Found Dead at 30

      Variety
    • Lawyer Tweets Screenshots from Alleged R. Kelly Sex Tape, Says It 'Leaves No Question' He's Guilty

      People
    • Disney Unveils Major Epcot Refurb That'll Change The Face Of Future World

      HuffPost Life
    • Meghan Markle Cradles Baby Bump Outside Her Baby Shower in New York City

      Meredith Videos
    • Charles Barkley Laughs While Criticizing Jussie Smollett: 'Do Not Commit Crimes with Checks'

      People
    • Don Lemon to Jussie Smollett: If Charges Are True, ‘Confess, Throw Yourself on the Mercy of the Court’

      The Wrap
    • Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen Kick Off the Model's Big Night with PDA on the Red Carpet

      People
    • R. Kelly arrested, charged in Chicago with sexual abuse

      Associated Press
    • Here's a Look at Meghan Markle's Baby Shower Flowers That Were Donated to Charity

      Entertainment Tonight
    • Katharine McPhee Would Love to Treat Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to Waitress Date Night

      People
    • Judge to Roger Stone: ‘This Is Not Baseball. There Will Not Be a Third Chance’

      Rolling Stone
    • Maxine Waters Reacts to Jussie Smollett Arrest: ‘I Would Be Disappointed’ if It’s a Hoax

      Variety