Arrest Made In Ohio Child Rape & Abortion Case Doubted By Fox News Pundits And Other Conservative Commentators

Ted Johnson
·6 min read
34
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

When President Joe Biden last week cited a report of a 10-year-old Ohio rape victim forced to travel out of state to Indiana to obtain an abortion, it quickly made national headlines in the heated environment following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe Vs. Wade.

In the days that followed, the story went viral, first as an example of the realities of new state abortion restrictions, then with doubts cast on the story by commentators on the right, such as Fox News’ Jesse Watters, who said Monday that if the story was not accurate, the mainstream media and Biden would be “seizing on another hoax.”

More from Deadline

Hosts and pundits on Outnumbered joined in the doubting.

But on Wednesday, the Columbus Dispatch reported that 27-year-old Gershon Fuentes had been arrested in the case. Ohio’s Attorney General Dave Yost, who on Monday told Watters that his office had not heard “a whisper” of the case, on Wednesday said that “we rejoice anytime a child rapist is taken off the streets.”

What has transpired is, in effect, a reverse debunking: The story targeted as suspect by some Fox News figures, deemed “too good to confirm” by The Wall Journal Journal editorial board and questioned by other media outlets, including The Washington Post fact checker, has instead been verified. Among the first to do so was the news side of Fox News.

In a July 1 story, The Indianapolis Star reported that Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, got a call from a child abuse doctor in Ohio who had a 10-year-old rape patient who could not get an abortion in the state because of a law passed just hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe. The girl then traveled to Indiana, which has not yet passed new restrictions.

In his speech, Biden lamented the post-Roe environment. “This isn’t some imagined horror. It is already happening,” he said.

The next day, Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler published an analysis of the story. His conclusion: “This is a very difficult story to check.” While Bernard was on the record, it was “all but impossible” to verify the claim without more specific details “that would identify the locality where the rape occurred.” The site Snopes.com also said that it could not verify the story.

In his commentary casting doubt on the story, Watters’ cited Kessler’s analysis, while noting the multiple media outlets that had picked it up. “We’re having no luck confirming this story,” while chiding the Indianapolis Star for, in his words, “running and hiding” from the story.

The next day, commentators on Outnumbered went even further, focusing in part on the fact that the IndyStar story was single sourced. Host Emily Compagno berated the IndyStar and said the news organization “deemed that the public’s right to know is folded in with their agenda.”

“Take it from me,” Compagno said, “because my wheelhouse was criminal law as an attorney. There is no shortage of 10-year-old rape victims. …There are so many monsters out there. So for me what I find so deeply offensive is that they had to make up a fake one.”

Contributor Charlie Hurt said, “The idea that you would have politicians in America trying to exploit a story like this, and make up a story like this, in order to advance their own sick agenda, tells you they are not serious about the issue, and they are not serious about the people who are affected by the issue.”

Guest Kellyanne Conway, former counselor to President Donald Trump, said that the story possibly was one in a line of  “too rich to verify” reports that got widespread traction in the media and on the left. “I hope it’s not true because the fact are so horrifying,” she said.

On Tuesday night, Fox News’ Aishah Hasnie, citing an unnamed source, reported on Special Report that the story was, in fact, true, that an arrest warrant was expected soon, and that Bernard was being investigated for possible medical privacy violations. “The source says the hospital strongly believes the HIPAA violation is how the White House confirmed the story. I”m told Bernard is still currently employed and working. And getting death threats.”

The Columbus Dispatch reported that Columbus police “were made aware of the girl’s pregnancy through a referral by Franklin County Children’s Services that was made by her mother on June 22.” Kessler wrote that he had contacted Franklin County officials for his original analysis, but they did not respond.

Kessler wrote on Twitter that his original piece noted that, “If a rapist is ever charged, the fact finally would have more solid grounding.”

“Now, a rapist has been charged and the story has been updated,” Kessler wrote. “Getting lots of angry emails but journalism is an accumulation of facts.”

A spokesperson for The Indianapolis Star said that its executive editor, Bro Krift, was unavailable for comment, but earlier this week the publication released a statement in which he said, “The facts and sourcing about people crossing state lines into Indiana, including the 10-year-old girl, for abortions are clear. We have no additional comment at this time.”

Kessler wrote that the story raises questions of single sourcing and independent confirmation, something left to others to consider. But it also is an example of the perils of punditry, whether it be on the right or the left. Hurt unintentionally addressed this, in the double negative, when he said on the Outnumbered panel, “Not having evidence that it is not true is not evidence that it is true. And that is sort of where the media has gone today.”

FoxNews.com, meanwhile, has updated its reporting on the case, now with a story, citing an ICE source, that the suspect in the case is an illegal immigrant.

Update: After suggesting that the story may be a hoax, Jesse Watters didn’t make any effort to correct the record or explain to viewers what happened. Instead, he claimed that his show “put on the pressure and how we’re glad justice is being served.” He also tried to pin blame on Bernard, claiming she covered it up, and suggested that there were questions of whether ” the alleged rapist’s immigration status played any role in the cover-up.”

Tucker Carlson, meanwhile, claimed that the story was “not true” earlier in the week but on Wednesday did not issue any kind of correction. Instead, he criticized the White House and Joe Biden, claiming that they did not vet the story. “Ten year old’s rapist is an illegal immigrant,” the chyron read.

 

Best of Deadline

Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Click here to read the full article.