Alan Dershowitz says none of the revelations in John Bolton's new book constitute an impeachable offense for Trump

In this image from video, Alan Dershowitz, an attorney for President Donald Trump, speaks during the impeachment trial against Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2020. (Senate Television via AP)
In this image from video, Alan Dershowitz, an attorney for President Donald Trump, speaks during the impeachment trial against Trump in the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2020. (Senate Television via AP)

Associated Press

President Donald Trump's high-profile lawyer Alan Dershowitz says none of the acts said to be described in John Bolton's coming book constitute an impeachable offense.

In Bolton's book, reported on ahead of its publication by The New York Times, the former US national security adviser reportedly says Trump told him in 2019 that he would withhold military aid from Ukraine until President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to investigate Trump's political rivals.

Trump's critics view the claim as a deadly blow to Trump's impeachment defense should it be submitted as formal testimony. The Trump team says the president withheld the aid over corruption fears and burden-sharing concerns.

Trump, Dershowitz
Trump, Dershowitz

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

But Dershowitz told the Senate on Monday evening that the reported Bolton claims, disruptive as they might be, did not constitute impeachable offenses even if true.

"If any president had done what The Times reported about the content of the Bolton manuscript, that would not constitute an impeachable offense," Dershowitz said.

"That is clear from the history," he said. "That is clear from the language of the Constitution."

Dershowitz said he felt obligated to defend the US Constitution and cited former Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Curtis' defense of President Andrew Johnson during his impeachment.

"You cannot turn conduct that is not impeachable into impeachable conduct simply by using words like 'quid pro quo' and 'personal benefit,'" Dershowitz said.

Several legal experts have said the details attributed to Bolton's book give overwhelming weight to the case that Trump broke the law.

Bolton's revelation "directly contradicts Trump's absurd defense on the facts," Jeffrey Cramer, a former longtime federal prosecutor who spent 12 years at the Justice Department, told Business Insider.

"The Senate can hear the story as part of their responsibilities, or they can hear it on Bolton's book tour."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate who like Dershowitz previously worked as a Harvard Law professor, criticized Dershowitz's oration on Monday night, saying: "I truly could not follow it."

FILE - In this July 8, 2019, file photo, national security adviser John Bolton speaks at the Christians United for Israel's annual summit, in Washington.  A single paper copy in a nondescript envelope arrived at the White House on Dec. 30. Four weeks later, news of John Bolton’s book manuscript about his time as President Donald Trump’s national security adviser has exploded into public view, sending a jolt through the president’s impeachment trial. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File)

Associated Press

"His characterization of the law simply is unsupported. He is a criminal law professor who stood in the well of the Senate and talked about how law never inquires into intent and that we should not be using the president's intent as part of understanding impeachment," Warren said, according to The Hill.

"Criminal law is all about intent," she said. "Mens rea is the heart of criminal law. That's the very basis of it. So it makes his whole presentation just nonsensical."

Bolton is yet to be called by the Senate to testify, but he said on January 6 that he was willing to if issued a subpoena.

On Monday, numerous legal experts called on Chief Justice John Roberts, who is overseeing the trial, to issue subpoenas himself, if the Republican-dominated Senate refused to.

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs for travel to New Orleans, Louisiana from the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, U.S., January 13, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs for travel to New Orleans, Louisiana from the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, U.S., January 13, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis

Reuters

The legal scholars Neal Katyal, Joshua Geltzer, and Mickey Edwards wrote in The New York Times that Roberts had full authority to do so under the 1868 Senate impeachment rules.

Trump's legal team also includes Ken Starr and Robert Ray, each of whom investigated President Bill Clinton during his impeachment; the White House counsel, Pat Cipollone; Trump's personal attorney Jay Sekulow; and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Dershowitz is a Harvard emeritus law professor and constitutional and criminal law scholar. He has often defended Trump in appearances on Fox News.

Trump and his allies have dismissed the impeachment as a "witch hunt" and a "hoax."

Read the original article on Business Insider