Yahoo

WPA Pool“What Meghan wants, Meghan gets,” Prince Harry is said to have dramatically declared in the run-up to the royal wedding.In this case, it seems, what Meghan wanted was a fancier engagement ring, and now that’s exactly what she has got.Eagle-eyed photo editors at Britain’s Sun newspaper have observed that Meghan has significantly upgraded the engagement ring given to her by Prince Harry.In its original configuration, the ring featured a thick gold band strung with a row of three diamonds.Harry said at the time: “The ring is obviously yellow gold because that’s her favorite, and the main stone itself is sourced from Botswana, and the little diamonds either side are from my mother’s jewelry collection, to make sure she’s with us on this crazy journey together.”Botswana holds special memories for Harry and Meghan as they spent her 36th birthday there, ahead of their engagement.Resetting an engagement ring, although sometimes awkward, is far from unheard of. Many is the stylish woman who, finding herself confronted with a less-than-perfect and very expensive engagement ring designed by her perhaps less aesthetically attuned husband, has decided to remodel.And The Sun, squinting over pictures of the princess taken at the Trooping of the Colour this month, has concluded that Meghan has done exactly this, resetting the stones on a much thinner, diamond-studded gold band.Meghan was observed to have ditched her engagement ring toward the end of her pregnancy, leading to speculation that her fingers had swollen, and it now appears this might be when the work on the jewelry was done.Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.

The bright spot in the distance was photographed days before the rover detected a possible sign of life on the Red Planet.

A backlash hit on Twitter when users began to criticize the appearance of teen singer Billie Eilish's after she was photographed wearing a tank top.

Long Island Man, 56, Died in the Dominican Republic

Nick Fury is not pleased. Samuel L. Jackson noticed a striking difference between adjacent posters for his upcoming Marvel film, “Spider-Man: Far From Home.”“Uhhhhhhh, What in the ACTUAL F-IS GOING ON HERE,” Jackson wrote on Instagram with a photo of the two photos.Take a look at the post on Jackson’s Instagram account here. See if you can “eyeball” the difference.Also Read: Samuel L. Jackson Loves Viral Mashup of 'Pulp Fiction' and Brett KavanaughSee it? Nick Fury’s eye patches are swapped in the two posters. The correct poster is the dark blue one on the right, in which Fury’s eye patch is appropriately on his left eye. Jackson captioned the photo with the hashtags headsgonroll and lefteyemuthaf--.A representative for Sony did not immediately respond to comment as to whether the poster with the incorrect image is real or to comment on the mistake.Although, the trailers for “Spider-Man: Far From Home” have suggested that after the events of “Avengers: Endgame,” Jake Gyllenhaal’s character, Mysterio, could come from an alternate universe. Maybe there’s an alternate universe or timeline where Fury damaged his right eye instead of his left? In “Captain Marvel,” we learned that Fury lost his eye as a result of a scratch from a cat…er, flerken.Also Read: 'Shaft' Film Review: Old-School Swagger Meets Millennial Wokeness in Uneasy Crime-Comedy MixBut we also learned in “Captain Marvel” about the existence of shape-shifting creatures called Skrulls. Perhaps a Skrull has infiltrated that poster and it’s up to us to detect the real one!Or it’s just a Photoshop error.“Spider-Man: Far From Home” opens in theaters July 2.Read original story Samuel L Jackson Calls Out ‘Spider-Man: Far From Home’ Poster That Swaps Nick Fury’s Eye Patch At TheWrap