• U.S.
    Good Morning America

    Scientists tested 14 types of masks: Here's what worked and what didn't

    As over 20 million across the globe have been diagnosed with COVID-19, scientists from Duke University took a look at face masks to see which ones work best in slowing the spread of coronavirus. In their study, they looked at 14 masks including N-95s, N-95s with valves and surgical masks to see how effective each was in keeping droplets from getting out. “It was mainly focused on the technique, a simple technique to visualize these droplet emissions and the effects of masks,” said Dr. Martin Fisher, an associate research professor from Duke University.

    Thanks for your feedback!
  • Thanks for your feedback!
  • Politics
    MarketWatch

    George Soros bashes President Trump, explains why he no longer participates in this market bubble

    Soros is confident the U.S. is better positioned to weather the pandemic than Europe, even though he took issue with the man calling the shots in the White House. Even in the United States, a confidence trickster like Trump can be elected president and undermine democracy from within,” he said. But in the U.S. you have a great tradition of checks and balances and established rules.

    Thanks for your feedback!
  • Thanks for your feedback!
  • Business
    The Wrap

    Facebook Could Face $500 Billion in Fines For Illegally Collecting Biometric Data Through Instagram

    Facebook-owned Instagram was sued Monday for illegally collecting, storing and distributing the facial recognition data of its users and could face up to $500 billion in fines.A class action lawsuit filed in San Mateo Superior Court by Illinois resident Kelly Whalen on Aug. 10 alleges that Facebook and Instagram are routinely harvesting and sharing its users’ biometric data without informing them or asking for consent to collect it.The lawsuit requests Facebook pay every member of the class $5,000 for each intentional violation of the Illinois BIPA act, which prohibits misuse of biometric data, or statutory damages of $1,000 for every negligent violation of the law — Business Insider estimated that could total up to $500 billion in fines given that at least 100 million Instagram users could be included in the class.Facebook recently paid $650 million in July to settle a similar case about its misuse of facial recognition data.“This suit is baseless. Instagram doesn’t use Face Recognition technology,” Facebook spokesperson Stephanie Otway told TheWrap in an email.Whalen’s class includes any Illinois resident who has had their biometric identifiers or facial geometry scans at all obtained by Facebook through photos uploaded to its Instagram app. The plaintiff is represented by Chicago-based law firm Carlson Lynch, which did not immediately respond to TheWrap’s requests for comment.Also Read: Olivia Munn in Final Talks for On and Off-Camera Deal With the Relaunching G4 Network (Exclusive)The lawsuit reports Facebook began using facial recognition technology in 2010 and started using it on Instagram after it bought the San Francisco-based photo sharing network in 2012. It essentially uses the tech to scan photos of faces uploaded to the Instagram app to collect a profile of unique facial recognition and other biological data for specific users.“Facebook is actively collecting, storing, disclosing, profiting from, and otherwise using the biometric information of its reportedly more than 100 million Instagram users without any written notice or informed written consent, including millions of Illinois residents,” the lawsuit reads.The practice is problematic in part because it doesn’t allow users to opt-out of data collection — “Indeed, Instagram users are not even given an opportunity to provide a written release because Facebook automatically processes content and shares it across its platforms,” the filing said.Also Read: Bon Appétit Video Host Carla Lalli Music Quits Amid Mass Exodus Over Diversity and Equality“Even if a user does not have facial recognition activated on their personal account, their photo may still be scanned, collected, and entered into Facebook’s database if it matches with a user’s data who does have the facial recognition setting activated,” the lawsuit notes. “This further means that one can never truly “opt out” because Facebook must capture and compare the biometrics of a face before learning if that face in fact matches with faces of users who have their facial recognition setting turned on or off.”The filing said that Instagram reported 118 million users in the United States last year — and points out that Whalen and other defendants (and most Instagram users) are unable to know which third parties Instagram allowed to view their facial recognition data or for what purpose.Instagram users whose data has been collected by Facebook “have no recourse for the fact that their biologically unique information has been compromised,” the lawsuit states.Read original story Facebook Could Face $500 Billion in Fines For Illegally Collecting Biometric Data Through Instagram At TheWrap

    Thanks for your feedback!